Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pancreatic ACA patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease were enrolled in a phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given i.v. on day 1 and gemcitabine i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. The primary end point of the trial was 6-month survival. Secondary end points included response rate, overall survival, median time to progression and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled, 46 of whom were evaluable. Of those patients assessed for the primary end point 50% lived for > or =6 months. The median time to progression was 4.53 months. Five confirmed responses were seen with a median duration of response of 2.7 months. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. However, one patient died as a result of treatment-related hemolytic uremic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, at doses of 1000 mg/m(2) and 100 mg/m(2), respectively, showed moderate activity in patients with pancreatic ACA. Based on the results of this study further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pancreatic ACA patients, with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease, were enrolled in a dose escalation study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Doses of both drugs were increased with sequential cohorts of patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were enrolled to three dose levels. DLT of neutropenia and a severe infection was noted at a dose of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity and nausea and vomiting were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities. The MTD, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, was well tolerated. Three confirmed responses were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ACA was determined. A phase II study of this combination is ongoing and will be reported separately at a later date.

Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report.

PURPOSE: Substantial and successful effort has been focused on decreasing the risk of local failure after rectal cancer surgery through the use of adjuvant therapies. Our study examined data from studies conducted by United States cooperative groups to investigate the impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical and pathologic reports from 673 patients with stage II/III rectal cancer enrolled onto three adjuvant clinical trials were reviewed for tumor and surgical variables. Additional information on individual institutions and operating surgeon was collected. Variables were tested for association with 5-year local recurrence and survival after adjustment for adjuvant treatments and other important prognostic factors. RESULTS: Five-year local recurrence and survival rates were 16% and 59%, respectively. Surgeons treating more than 10 study cases had lower local recurrence rates than those treating < or = 10 (11% v 17%, P =.02). Free radial margins also correlated with local recurrence (P =.01). Type of surgery, distal margins, and tumor radial spread were not significant. Tumor adherence to adjacent structures predicted local recurrence (35% v 14%, P <.001) and survival (30% v 63%, P <.001), regardless of en bloc resection. Although T and N classification predicted survival (P <.001), only N classification correlated with local recurrence. The number and percentage of positive nodes correlated with survival, but only the percentage independently predicted local recurrence. Several pathologic and surgical variables were reported suboptimally. CONCLUSION: Moderate variability in outcomes among surgeons was detected in this high-risk population. Efforts to improve surgical results will require changes in reporting practices to allow for more accurate assessment of the quality of surgery.

A simple stratification factor prognostic for survival in advanced cancer: the good/bad/uncertain index.

PURPOSE: This article summarizes the third step of a research program to identify variables that supplement the predictive power of the the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) for survival. The objective was to produce a simple, practical, stratification factor for phase III oncology clinical trials involving patients with advanced malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 729 patients with metastatic colorectal or lung cancers. Patients provided a Karnofsky index and appetite rating while physicians provided a survival estimate and the ECOG-PS. Scores for each item were categorized as having a positive, neutral, or negative indication for survival. A patient was classified as having a relatively good prognosis if three or more of the four items showed a positive indication, a bad prognosis if three or more items were negative, and an uncertain prognosis otherwise (Good/Bad/Uncertain [GBU] index). RESULTS: The GBU index improved on the prognostic power of a Cox model quartile index and PS alone and increased the accuracy of survival classification estimates by 5% to 10% more than ECOG-PS alone. For patients with PS of 0 or 1, significant survival patterns exist between GBU groups (P=.002 and.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The GBU index may be recommended as a supplementary stratification factor for certain future phase III trials in metastatic lung or colorectal cancer where patient heterogeneity is a particular concern. The GBU represents a relatively modest increase to the cost and patient burden of a clinical trial given the additional control that is achieved over the potentially confounding concomitant to the treatment variable.

A phase II study of sequential combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In an earlier study of previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we used a concomitant combination of chlorambucil and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine and reported overall (OR) and complete (CR) remission rates of 80% and 20%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 5 years, more than 80% of the responders have had a relapse. In the current phase II study of 27 previously untreated patients with CLL, we used a sequential combination of six cycles of intravenous cyclophosphamide (1 g/m2) plus oral prednisone (100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) followed by two to six cycles of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (5 mg/m2 per day for 5 days). The OR and CR rates were 96% and 33%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 35% of the responders have had a relapse. Progression-free survival was significantly better in CR patients than in those with partial remission. However, minimal residual disease was phenotypically detected in four of the nine CR patients. Despite the fact that the current OR and CR rates are superior to those seen in a historical cohort treated with a concomitant schedule, a longer follow-up period is needed to assess the durability of these remissions, and a controlled trial is necessary to estimate the impact on overall survival and toxicity.

Comparison of conventional dose and double dose carboplatin in patients receiving cyclophosphamide plus carboplatin for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study.

Between March 1992 and November 1994, 91 patients with stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in a randomized comparative study of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 plus carboplatin 300 mg/m2 vs. cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 plus carboplatin 600 mg/m2, each regimen given monthly for six cycles. Patients on the intensive regimen also received 10 micrograms/kg of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (molgramostim) daily for 14 days following each chemotherapy treatment. The study was closed prematurely because of very poor case accrual following the preliminary announcement (in May 1993) that paclitaxel appeared superior to cyclophosphamide in the platinum-based treatment of ovarian cancer. More than 4 years after our last case entry, we analyzed the survival results for the 44 eligible patients who received the conventional dose of carboplatin and the 43 eligible patients receiving our intensified dose of carboplatin. More than 90% of the treated patients receiving the conventional dose regimen received at least 75% of the planned doses at each of the six treatment intervals, whereas the percentage of treated patients able to receive at least 75% of the assigned intensive dose regimen had declined from 95% in cycle 2 to 53% by cycle 6. Furthermore, although 32 patients received all six planned cycles of treatment in the conventional regimen group, only 15 received all six cycles of the intensified regimen. Patients receiving the intensive regimen had more fever, dermatitis, lethargy, musculoskeletal pain, and pulmonary complications than did the conventional dose patients. Median survival times for the two treatment groups were very similar (38.5 and 38.1 months, respectively, for the conventional and intensive regimens), and we saw no evidence that the distribution of survival times differed between the treatment regimens (p = 0.95).

Megestrol and tamoxifen in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E4882).

To investigate the effect of adding tamoxifen to megestrol in the hormonal therapy for advanced endometrial cancer, 66 patients were entered in this study. Initially, 41 patients were randomized to either the standard progestin therapy of megestrol or to the combination of megestrol and tamoxifen between October 1982 and October 1984. The megestrol arm was terminated because of poor accrual and 25 patients were directly assigned to the combination arm. Among the 20 eligible cases on the megestrol arm, the response rate of 20% consisted of I complete response and 3 partial responses. The response rate on the megestrol plus tamoxifen arm was 19% with 1 (2%) complete response and 7 (17%) partial responses among 42 eligible cases. The median survival times were 12.0 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Only mild and moderate toxicities were observed on megestrol compared with more toxic complications observed on the combination of megestrol and tamoxifen, including a life-threatening case of pulmonary embolism. Although we could not carry out a comparative evaluation as intended, we conclude that the combination of megestrol and tamoxifen offers no clinical advantage over megestrol alone in the treatment of advanced endometrial carcinoma.

A phase II trial of edatrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplastin, and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) in patients with non-small-cell carcinoma of the lungs: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial.

Edatrexate is an antifolate agent with improved in vitro antineoplastic activity as compared with methotrexate. A Mayo phase I trial of edatrexate (E), vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (GCSF), (EVAC-GCSF) showed promising antineoplastic activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Colon-Otero G, et al. Cancer J Sci Am 1997;3:297-302) leading to a phase II trial of this regimen, the results of which are reported here. A total of 34 patients with stage IIIB or IV measurable or evaluable NSCLC were entered in this North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II study. Treatment consisted of edatrexate 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2/d on day 1 and day 2 followed by vinblastine 3 mg/m2 intravenously and doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 intravenously on day 2. Filgrastim was given at 300 microg subcutaneously daily from day 4 to day 18 or until an absolute neutrophil count of 2,000/mm3 or more was obtained. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until either progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Sixteen of 34 evaluable patients responded to therapy, for a response rate of 47.1% with a 95% CI of 30.3% to 63.8%. Median time to disease progression was 132 days, median survival time was 219 days, and the estimated 1-year survival was 41.2% (95% CI of 27.6-61.5%). The EVAC/G-CSF regimen has significant antineoplastic activity as seen by the response rates for patients with NSCLC. However, this study had significant myelosuppressive toxicity; 56% patients had grade III or higher leukopenia with three treatment-related deaths observed. In addition, Quality of Life assessments indicate that patients experienced an overall decline in quality of life during the course of treatment. These mitigating factors need to be considered regarding further evaluation of this regimen in this patient population.

A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase II trial of 9-aminocamptothecin in previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Topoisomerase I inhibitors have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The authors performed a Phase II study to evaluate the objective tumor response rate of 2 different doses and schedules of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) in previously untreated patients with measurable recurrent metastatic colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were registered. One schedule evaluated 9-AC given at 1100 microgram/m(2)/24 hours by continuous infusion for 72 hours along with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor at 5 microgram/kg/day on Days 5 through 12. Another schedule involved 9-AC at 480 microgram/m(2)/24 hours by continuous infusion for 120 hours on Days 1, 8, and 15 given every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 51 patients (94%) were evaluable (28 patients who received 72-hour infusion and 20 patients who received 120-hour infusion) for response and toxicity. Significant hematologic toxicities were encountered, especially with the 72-hour infusion schedule, in which 43% (12 of 28) and 28% (8 of 28) experienced Grade 4 (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was encountered in 61% (17 of 28) and 11% (2 of 19) of patients on the 72-hour and 120-hour infusion schedules, respectively. Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and hepatotoxicity were troublesome nonhematologic toxicities. Seventy-nine percent (11 of 14) and 57% (4 of 7) of the patients experiencing Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity were on the 72-hour infusion schedule. Three patients died of chemotherapy-related toxicity. One response was observed in 48 evaluable patients (2%). CONCLUSIONS: 9-AC did not demonstrate sufficient antitumor activity and had unacceptable toxicity in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Significance of neuron-specific enolase levels before and during therapy for small cell lung cancer.

The level of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has been implicated as a prognostic factor for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A prospective evaluation was undertaken to assess the prognostic significance of pretreatment NSE and treatment-induced minimum NSE values in patients with SCLC. Patients from two Phase III North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials [one for patients with extensive stage SCLC and one for patients with limited stage SCLC] were asked to enter this laboratory correlational trial. Both trials included treatment with four to six cycles of etoposide and cisplatin, and 121 patients (71 extensive stage SCLC and 50 limited stage SCLC) were entered into the present study of NSE. Pretreatment NSE values and treatment-induced minimum NSE values were independent predictors of time to progression and survival in multivariate analysis. Hazard rate modeling allowed the formulation of specific relationships of NSE to time to progression and survival. Pretreatment NSE levels inversely correlated with time to progression and survival in these patients with SCLC. Pretreatment NSE accounted for 28% of the variance in survival. Both pretreatment NSE and treatment-induced minimum NSE were independent prognostic predictors of time to progression and survival.

A phase II study of paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This Phase II multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2) by 3-hour infusion) with carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per minute) administered every 3 weeks as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma. METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable metastatic disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy, including anthracycline-based therapy, was allowed, as was prior hormonal therapy as part of either adjuvant treatment or treatment for metastasis. Prior therapy with taxanes or platinum was not allowed. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in this study, with 50 patients evaluable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate was 62% (95% confidence interval ¿CI, 48-75%); 16% of patients had complete responses and 46% had partial responses. The median time to progression was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.9-12.9), and the 12-month survival estimate was 72% (95% CI, 61-86%). Therapy was generally well tolerated. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the predominant toxicity, observed in 82% of patients, but there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia or sepsis. Hematopoietic growth factors were not routinely necessary. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 16% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) with carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per minute) demonstrated substantial efficacy in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, and the 12-month survival rate of 72% was encouraging. This therapy represents a viable option for patients with metastatic disease.

A randomized phase II and pharmacokinetic study of dacarbazine in patients with recurrent glioma.

We conducted a randomized phase II study to determine the efficacy of dacarbazine (DTIC) in recurrent gliomas. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either DTIC 750 mg/m2 IV day 1 every 28 days (Arm A) or DTIC 200 mg/m2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days (Arm B). Pharmacokinetics were studied in 6 patients on each arm using HPLC analysis. Thirty-nine patients (30 male, 9 female), ages 27-67 years (median 53) were entered on the study (20 on Arm A, 19 on Arm B). No objective responses were seen. Median time to progression was 3 months. Median survival was 8 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Major toxicities were grade 1-2 nausea (33%). lethargy (28%), diarrhea (15%), alopecia (15%), and grade 3 neutropenia (8%). Four patients on Arm A had mild self-limited episodes of intravascular hemolysis occurring immediately after drug infusion, the mechanism of which is unknown. Mean AUC for DTIC, HMMTIC (5-[3-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-1-triazeno] imidazole-4-carboxamide), and MTIC (5-[3-methyl-1-triazenol imidazole-4-carboxamide), in Arm A were 14.8, 0.17, and 1.15 mM min, respectively. Corresponding values for Arm B (on day 1 of 5) were 1.7, 0.06, and 0.29 mM min, respectively. The predicted HMMTIC and MTIC exposure over 5 days for Arm B, based on the day 1 data, is higher than with Arm A. We conclude that DTIC is well tolerated but does not have activity in patients with recurrent gliomas. The 5-day schedule appears less toxic, and pharmacokinetic studies show that it provides greater exposure to MTIC and HMMTIC compared to the one-day schedule.

Phase III clinical trial of the combination of cisplatin, dacarbazine, and carmustine with or without tamoxifen in patients with advanced malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted to assess whether the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to the three-agent regimen of cisplatin (CDDP), dacarbazine (DTIC), and carmustine (BCNU) significantly increased the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with CDDP + DTIC + BCNU (CDB) with or without TAM. The dose schedule was CDDP 25 mg/m(2) given intravenously (IV) for 30 to 45 minutes in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) normal saline (NS) on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; DTIC 220 mg/m(2) IV for 1 hour in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) NaCl on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; BCNU 150 mg/m(2) IV for 2 to 3 hours in 750 to 1,000 mL of dextrose and 5% water on day 1 of every odd 3-week cycle; and TAM 20 mg taken orally every morning. RESULTS: There were 184 eligible patients enrolled. These patients were observed until death or for a minimum of 1.3 years. At last contact, 12 were still alive. The median time to progression was 3.4 months on the CDB arm and 3.1 months on the CDB + TAM arm. The median survival time was 6.8 months with CDB and 6.9 months with CDB + TAM. Progression-free survival (P =.429) and overall survival (P =.545) were not found to differ by treatment. CONCLUSION: The addition of TAM to this three-agent regimen of CDB was not found to provide a meaningful clinical advantage in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant melanoma.

Phase III comparison of twice-daily split-course irradiation versus once-daily irradiation for patients with limited stage small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Because small-cell lung cancer is a rapidly proliferating tumor, it was hypothesized that it may be more responsive to thoracic irradiation (TI) given twice-daily than once-daily. This hypothesis was tested in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer were entered onto a phase III trial, and all patients initially received three cycles of etoposide (130 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). Subsequently, patients who did not have progression to a distant site (other than brain) were randomized to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI) versus once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI) given concomitantly with two additional cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). The irradiation doses were TDTI, 48 Gy in 32 fractions, with a 2.5-week break after the initial 24 Gy, and ODTI, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After thoracic irradiation, the patients received a sixth cycle of etoposide/cisplatin, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (30 Gy/15 fractions) if they had a complete response. RESULTS: Of 311 assessable patients enrolled in the trial, 262 underwent randomization to TDTI or ODTI. There were no differences between the two treatments with respect to local-only progression rates, overall progression rates, or overall survival. The patients who received TDTI had greater esophagitis (> or = grade 3) than those who received ODTI (12.3% v 5.3%; P =.05). Although patients received thoracic irradiation encompassing the postchemotherapy volumes, only seven of 90 local failures were out of the portal of irradiation. CONCLUSION: When TI is delayed until the fourth cycle of chemotherapy, TDTI does not result in improvement in local control or survival compared with ODTI.

North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose levamisole for gastric and gastroesophageal cancer using survival as the primary endpoint of efficacy.

At present there is no established standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Combination regimens have yielded response rates at times exceeding 50% but with no improvement in survival compared to single agents. This study examined the role of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose levamisole in a phase II setting using survival as the main endpoint. Patients with advanced carcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were treated with 5-fluorouracil, 450 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5, and levamisole, 100 mg/m2 orally three times daily on days 1 to 3, and 50 mg/m2 tid days 4 to 5 every 5 weeks. To allow more rapid accrual and to study a population that more accurately reflects the makeup of patients treated in clinical practice, patients with both measurable and nonmeasurable disease were entered in this study. Two of fifteen (13%) patients with measurable disease experienced a partial response to treatment. The adjusted 1-year survival rate for the 44 patients entered was 29.6%, which is similar to the historical 1-year survival of 30% observed in a group of nearly 400 patients treated in prior North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies. This regimen offers no improvement in therapeutic activity for advanced gastric cancer. This study design, however, allows rapid screening of phase II regimens in patients who would usually be candidates for phase III trials.

Phase II study of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in combination with chlorambucil in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of adding a maximally tolerated dose of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) to standard chlorambucil (CLB) therapy in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Thirty patients with CLL (median age, 64 years) received two courses of 2-CdA given intravenously (2 mg/m2 daily for 7 days) added to biweekly administration of CLB at 30 mg/m2 given orally. The diagnosis of CLL, treatment indications, and response criteria were according to the National Cancer Institute established guidelines. Sixteen patients (53%) had advanced-stage disease, and four (13%) had trisomy 12 abnormality. The overall remission rate was 80%, including 20% complete remission (CR), 30% nodular partial remission (nPR), and 30% partial remission (PR). Minimal residual disease was detected phenotypically in two of five patients with CR and in eight of nine with nPR. Overall, CR, nPR, and PR rates were not influenced significantly by the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities or advanced clinical stage. With a median follow-up of 33 months, 58% of patients who had a response had relapse. Median time to progression in all 30 patients was 30 months, and time to progression and progression-free survival were not significantly different for the different response groups, clinical stages, or cytogenetic groups. Severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 33% and 7% of patients, respectively. Only two patients had documented bacterial infections, and four had herpetic infections. Concurrent combination chemotherapy with abbreviated doses of 2-CdA and standard-dose CLB is feasible and safe in previously untreated CLL. Antitumor activity may be superior to that of CLB alone given in conventional doses. Whether a different schedule of combining these two agents would result in improved outcome is being investigated.

Randomized comparison of megestrol acetate versus dexamethasone versus fluoxymesterone for the treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia.

PURPOSE: Previous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that both corticosteroids and progestational agents do partially alleviate cancer anorexia/cachexia. Pilot information suggested that an anabolic corticosteroid might also improve appetite in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The current trial was developed to compare and contrast a progestational agent, a corticosteroid, and an anabolic corticosteroid for the treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients suffering from cancer anorexia/cachexia were randomized to receive either dexamethasone 0. 75 mg qid, megestrol acetate 800 mg orally every day, or fluoxymesterone 10 mg orally bid. Patients were observed at monthly intervals to evaluate weight changes and drug toxicity. Patients also completed questionnaires at baseline and at monthly intervals to evaluate appetite and drug toxicities. RESULTS: Fluoxymesterone resulted in significantly less appetite enhancement and did not have a favorable toxicity profile. Megestrol acetate and dexamethasone caused a similar degree of appetite enhancement and similar changes in nonfluid weight status, with nonsignificant trends favoring megestrol acetate for both of these parameters. Dexamethasone was observed to have more corticosteroid-type toxicity and a higher rate of drug discontinuation because of toxicity and/or patient refusal than megestrol acetate (36% v 25%; P =.03). Megestrol acetate had a higher rate of deep venous thrombosis than dexamethasone (5% v 1%; P =.06). CONCLUSION: Whereas fluoxymesterone clearly seems to be an inferior choice for treating cancer anorexia/cachexia, megestrol acetate and dexamethasone have similar appetite stimulating efficacy but differing toxicity profiles.

Evaluation of tamoxifen plus letrozole with assessment of pharmacokinetic interaction in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

The goals of this clinical trial involving postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer were to: (a) examine the effects of letrozole on tamoxifen (TAM) pharmacokinetics; (b) examine estrogen suppression in patients receiving TAM plus letrozole; and (c) evaluate tolerability, toxicity, objective response, and time to progression for the combination. Postmenopausal women with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer received TAM (20 mg daily) for 6 weeks, and then letrozole (2.5 mg daily) was added. To examine for any effect of letrozole on the levels of TAM and two metabolites [N-desmethyl-TAM and 4-hydroxy-TAM], serum samples were obtained at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. To examine for aromatase inhibition, serum samples were obtained before treatment and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks for estradiol, estrone (E1) E1 sulfate, and sex hormone-binding globulin. A total of 34 patients were entered on this trial, and 23 patients were still on study at week 24, 18 of whom had blood samples available at both week 6 and week 24. The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between levels at week 24 and levels at week 6 was -34 to 15 ng/ml for TAM, -35 to 45 ng/ml for N-desmethyl-TAM, and -1 to 2 for 4-hydroxy-TAM. For estradiol, a significant decrease (median, 88.5%; range, 73.7-95.2%) was identified after 6 weeks of letrozole, which was maintained for an additional 12 weeks. Similar significant reductions were identified for E1. E1 sulfate levels increased after 6 weeks of TAM alone but then decreased significantly after the addition of letrozole. Sex hormone-binding globulin levels were significantly elevated after 6 weeks of TAM alone and remained elevated after the addition of letrozole. Six of the 34 patients (17.6%) achieved an objective response (95% confidence interval, 6.8-34.5%), with a median time to disease progression of 7.6 months. There was no indication of a systematic decrease in TAM, N-desmethyl-TAM, or 4-hydroxy-TAM after the additional of letrozole. Estrogen suppression induced by letrozole was substantial despite the concomitant administration of TAM. The antitumor effect of TAM plus letrozole was less than expected.

A randomized trial of tamoxifen alone or combined with octreotide in the treatment of women with metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen (TAM) is generally considered the hormonal agent of choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast carcinoma. The somatostatin analogues, including octreotide, have demonstrated inhibition of breast carcinoma cell lines and multiple endocrinologic actions, including reduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a potent mitogen for breast carcinoma cells. In an attempt to improve the efficacy of TAM, this randomized trial was performed. METHODS: One hundred thirty-five eligible postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma were randomized to TAM (10 mg twice daily) alone or combined with octreotide 150 microg (administered subcutaneously thrice daily). The two groups were well balanced, except the TAM group had higher proportions of patients with visceral disease (50% vs. 37%) and a disease free interval longer than 5 years (47% vs. 34%). A cohort of 18 patients was evaluated for the impact of treatment on serum IGF-I, free IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 levels, and total IGF binding capacity. RESULTS: The median time to progression was estimated to be 14.2 months with TAM and 10.3 months with TAM plus octreotide. The distribution of progression free survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.26), and the progression hazard ratio (TAM/TAM + octreotide) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.17). The distribution of survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.92), and the death hazard ratio was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.62-1.55). When the 106 patients with measurable or evaluable disease were considered, the objective response rate was 49% with TAM alone and 43% with TAM plus octreotide (P = 0.70). Patients who received TAM plus octreotide had higher incidences of nausea, diarrhea, and steatorrhea. The percentage of decline in serum IGF-I, from pretreatment levels to those following 3-6 weeks of treatment, was significantly greater (P < 0.01) with TAM plus octreotide than with TAM alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is no indication that the combination of TAM plus octreotide as administered in this study is substantially more efficacious than TAM alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma. The limited cohort included in IGF-I studies suggests that TAM plus octreotide produces a significantly greater reduction in serum IGF-I levels.